Custody and Access
The terms “custody” and “access” are no longer used by the Family Court in Australia as they were considered to place the emphasis on parents and not on children, i.e. one of the parents having custody of their child and one parent having access to their child. Instead the Court prefers terms that are more child focused, and so presently the Court refers to where a child predominantly resides or lives and who a child has contact or spends time with. For that reason these type of parenting orders are some times referred to as “residence” or “lives with” and “contact” or “spends time with” orders.
(a) ensuring that children have the benefit of both of their parents having a meaningful involvement in their lives, to the maximum extent consistent with the best interests of the child; and
(b) protecting children from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence; and
(c) ensuring that children receive adequate and proper parenting to help them achieve their full potential; and
(d) ensuring that parents fulfill their duties, and meet their responsibilities, concerning the care, welfare and development of their children.
The Court upholds the following principles unless it would be contrary to a child's best interests:
(a) children have the right to know and be cared for by both their parents, regardless of whether their parents are married, separated, have never married or have never lived together; and
(b) children have a right to spend time on a regular basis with, and communicate on a regular basis with, both their parents and other people significant to their care, welfare and development (such as grandparents and other relatives); and
(c) parents jointly share duties and responsibilities concerning the care, welfare and development of their children; and
(d) parents should agree about the future parenting of their children; and
(e) children have a right to enjoy their culture (including the right to enjoy that culture with other people who share that culture).
Related Articles
- Removal of newborn child Recent success in assisting our client to recover his son
- A new approach to resolving family law and de facto disputes Collaborative law
- Are you in a de facto relationship that puts your property at risk? Domestic/de facto relationships
- Do I have to mediate before I commence proceedings in the Family Court? Compulsory mediation in parenting proceedings
- What are my legal rights to ensure my children continue using my surname?
Key People
Greg Dickson
primary area of practice is litigation. In 1993, he became one of the first solicitors in New South Wales to achieve Accreditation as a Specialist in Family Law and Property Relationships Act Law. Greg is the head of our Family Law Division but also practices extensively in commercial and general litigation ...read more
Kevin Dwyer
can advise you upon and conduct all Family Law and De Facto Relationship matters in the Family Courts at Sydney, Wollongong and Parramatta. Kevin can also assist you in Criminal Law and appear in Local Courts all over New South Wales in AVO and criminal proceedings as well as ...read more
Amanda Doring
is a Family Law Accredited Specialist with extensive experience drafting binding financial agreements and conducting urgent applications in the Family Court and Federal Magistrate’s Court as well as De Facto proceedings in the Supreme, District and Local Courts ...read more
Lisa O'Leary
operates predominantly in the area of Family Law and De Facto Relationship dispute resolution in the Family Court, the Federal Magistrates Court, the Local and Supreme Court or by alternative dispute resolution procedures ...read more
Nicola Morgan
Nicola joined Warren McKeon Dickson in January 2009 as the recipient of the Warren McKeon Dickson Work Integrated Learning Scholarship offered in conjunction with the University of Wollongong. ...read more

